But the problem with plastic is more fundamental: you use it because it’s biologically resistant.

But the problem with plastic is more fundamental: you use it because it’s biologically resistant.

But the problem with plastic is more fundamental: you use it because it’s biologically resistant. However, if it gets into the environment, that is exactly a problem.

Page 1 of 1  

The EU Commission proposed a broad plastic ban on Monday. It’s about ten single-use products that cause 70 percent of all marine litter.

The Vice President of the EU Commission, Frans Timmermans, explained that plastic waste ends up in the air, in the ground, in the oceans, in food and also in human bodies.

For which articles the ban should apply

Specifically, there should be a ban on plastics if affordable alternatives are available. The marketing ban should therefore apply to cotton swabs, cutlery, plates, drinking straws, stirring sticks and balloon sticks made of plastic, which must be made entirely from environmentally friendly materials. Disposable beverage containers containing plastic will only be approved if their lids and closures are attached to them. It is essential “” that we find less single-use plastic in our supermarkets. We’re going to get some of these items off the shelves and replace them with cleaner alternatives, “Timmermans pointed out.

Are you in favor of such a plastic ban?

  • Yes, that is long overdue.
  • No, it is not necessary.
  • I do not care.

Vote Show results

States should ensure that less plastic food packaging and beverage cups are used. Manufacturers are used to help cover waste management and environmental cleanup costs, as well as awareness-raising activities. This applies to plastic products such as containers, cups and film packaging for food, beverage bottles, tobacco products with filters such as cigarette butts, wet wipes or light plastic carrier bags.

As a target for collection, the EU states are obliged to achieve a collection rate of 90 percent for disposable plastic beverage bottles by 2025, for example through deposit systems.

Timmermanns explained that balloons themselves are not banned, but the plastic sticks on which they are attached. For fishing gear, which accounts for 27 percent of all beach litter, the Commission intends to supplement the existing policy framework with systems of producer responsibility for fishing gear containing plastic. Manufacturers of such fishing gear will have to pay for the collection of waste from port reception facilities and for the transport and processing of this waste.

Use plastics more responsibly

The Vice President of the EU Commission Jyrki Katainen said that plastics are very practical, but they should be used more responsibly. Disposable plastic is not an economically or ecologically intelligent solution. Plastics would make up 85 percent of marine litter worldwide. That is why the plastic problem has to be tackled, stressed Timmermans and Katainen.https://123helpme.me/ They are also betting on a change in consumer behavior regarding plastic.

Timmermans put the benefit for consumers through plastic restrictions at 6.5 billion euros. Of course, the plastic reduction will cost a lot, but this is less than the advantages. Today beaches are being cleaned by the public purse and by volunteers. Those who create the plastic waste would not take responsibility. This has to change.

The Austrian Ministry of the Environment is “” relatively positive about the planned ban on plastic, provided there are good alternatives for the products concerned, said Daniel Kosak, spokesman for Environment Minister Elisabeth Köstinger (ÖVP). The Ministry of the Environment rejects the proposal made in the discussion for a possible tax on plastics.

EU parliamentarians for urgent waste reduction

Austrian MEPs have welcomed the Commission’s proposal for a broad ban on single-use plastic products. The ÖVP European mandate Lukas Mandl said that the environment was becoming more and more polluted and that this should not be watched idly. The SPÖ MP Karin Kadenbach described the EU Commission’s proposals as useful.

Mandl said it was high time to break new ground to avoid plastic waste. The Commission’s proposals should be carefully examined, in particular whether they are practicable and effective. In any case, the problem with plastic waste has reached worrying proportions.

Kadenbach said that in light of this environmental disaster caused by single-use plastics, which make up half of all marine litter, one should not turn a blind eye. The Commission estimates that by 2050 there will be more plastic than fish in the seas.

NGOs called for further steps

Environmental protection organizations have welcomed the plastic directive proposed by the EU in principle, but called for further steps. “” In the draft, for example, no EU-wide reduction targets for food containers or disposable coffee cups are set, “” criticized Greenpeace in a broadcast.

Greenpeace called on the members of the European Parliament and the European governments to “” go further and set specific EU-wide reduction targets “”. “” As important and gratifying as this draft directive is, unfortunately without these specific reduction targets it is relatively toothless. Environment Minister (Elisabeth, note) Köstinger now has to work towards specific goals at European level in order to curb the flood of plastic, “” said consumer spokeswoman Nunu Kaller.

Global 2000 also criticized the lack of concrete reduction targets. Lisa Kernegger, ecologist at Global 2000 said that there is only a “” significant reduction “” in food containers and disposable cups made of plastic. The strategy presented today is a step with great symbolic power, but it can only represent the beginning, “said Kernegger.

Criticism from the plastics industry

Criticism of the EU guideline proposal to ban certain plastic products came from the Association of the Austrian Chemical Industry. The guideline “misses the target” “, said Helmut Schwarzl, chairman of the plastics industry professional group, on Monday.

Rather than banning plastic products to combat the problem of litter, it is more effective to raise people’s awareness of the careful use of resources of all kinds. “” When certain products are banned, the problem is shifted from plastic to other materials that are found on the beach. Litter should definitely be avoided, regardless of whether it’s made of plastic, aluminum, glass or paper, “” said Schwarzl.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

Sign In Connect with Facebook Mailyn P. Mon. May 28th. 2018 20:33 report reply

There was a recent statement that 50 percent of new plastic input into the oceans comes from just 5 major rivers. But the problem with plastic is more fundamental: you use it because it’s biologically resistant. However, if it gets into the environment, that is exactly a problem.

Page 1 of 1  

The EU Commission proposed a broad plastic ban on Monday. It’s about ten single-use products that cause 70 percent of all marine litter.

The Vice President of the EU Commission, Frans Timmermans, explained that plastic waste ends up in the air, in the ground, in the oceans, in food and also in human bodies.

For which articles the ban should apply

Specifically, there should be a ban on plastics if affordable alternatives are available. The marketing ban should therefore apply to cotton swabs, cutlery, plates, drinking straws, stirring sticks and balloon sticks made of plastic, which must be made entirely from environmentally friendly materials. Disposable beverage containers containing plastic will only be approved if their lids and closures are attached to them. It is essential “” that we find less single-use plastic in our supermarkets. We’re going to get some of these items off the shelves and replace them with cleaner alternatives, “Timmermans pointed out.

Are you in favor of such a plastic ban?

  • Yes, that is long overdue.
  • No, it is not necessary.
  • I do not care.

Vote Show results

States should ensure that less plastic food packaging and beverage cups are used. Manufacturers are used to help cover waste management and environmental cleanup costs, as well as awareness-raising activities. This applies to plastic products such as containers, cups and film packaging for food, beverage bottles, tobacco products with filters such as cigarette butts, wet wipes or light plastic carrier bags.

As a target for collection, the EU states are obliged to achieve a collection rate of 90 percent for disposable plastic beverage bottles by 2025, for example through deposit systems.

Timmermanns explained that balloons themselves are not banned, but the plastic sticks on which they are attached. For fishing gear, which accounts for 27 percent of all beach litter, the Commission intends to supplement the existing policy framework with systems of producer responsibility for fishing gear containing plastic. Manufacturers of such fishing gear will have to pay for the collection of waste from port reception facilities and for the transport and processing of this waste.

Use plastics more responsibly

The Vice President of the EU Commission Jyrki Katainen said that plastics are very practical, but they should be used more responsibly. Disposable plastic is not an economically or ecologically intelligent solution. Plastics would make up 85 percent of marine litter worldwide. That is why the plastic problem has to be tackled, stressed Timmermans and Katainen. They are also betting on a change in consumer behavior regarding plastic.

Timmermans put the benefit for consumers through plastic restrictions at 6.5 billion euros. Of course, the plastic reduction will cost a lot, but this is less than the advantages. Today beaches are being cleaned by the public purse and by volunteers. Those who create the plastic waste would not take responsibility. This has to change.

The Austrian Ministry of the Environment is “” relatively positive about the planned ban on plastic, provided there are good alternatives for the products concerned, said Daniel Kosak, spokesman for Environment Minister Elisabeth Köstinger (ÖVP). The Ministry of the Environment rejects the proposal made in the discussion for a possible tax on plastics.

EU parliamentarians for urgent waste reduction

Austrian MEPs have welcomed the Commission’s proposal for a broad ban on single-use plastic products. The ÖVP European mandate Lukas Mandl said that the environment was becoming more and more polluted and that this should not be watched idly. The SPÖ MP Karin Kadenbach described the EU Commission’s proposals as useful.

Mandl said it was high time to break new ground to avoid plastic waste. The Commission’s proposals should be carefully examined, in particular whether they are practicable and effective. In any case, the problem with plastic waste has reached worrying proportions.

Kadenbach said that in light of this environmental disaster caused by single-use plastics, which make up half of all marine litter, one should not turn a blind eye. The Commission estimates that by 2050 there will be more plastic than fish in the seas.

NGOs called for further steps

Environmental protection organizations have welcomed the plastic directive proposed by the EU in principle, but called for further steps. “” In the draft, for example, no EU-wide reduction targets for food containers or disposable coffee cups are set, “” criticized Greenpeace in a broadcast.

Greenpeace called on the members of the European Parliament and the European governments to “” go further and set specific EU-wide reduction targets “”. “” As important and gratifying as this draft directive is, unfortunately without these specific reduction targets it is relatively toothless. Environment Minister (Elisabeth, note) Köstinger now has to work towards specific goals at European level in order to curb the flood of plastic, “” said consumer spokeswoman Nunu Kaller.

Global 2000 also criticized the lack of concrete reduction targets. Lisa Kernegger, ecologist at Global 2000 said that there is only a “” significant reduction “” in food containers and disposable cups made of plastic. The strategy presented today is a step with great symbolic power, but it can only represent the beginning, “said Kernegger.

Criticism from the plastics industry

Criticism of the EU guideline proposal to ban certain plastic products came from the Association of the Austrian Chemical Industry. The guideline “misses the target” “, said Helmut Schwarzl, chairman of the plastics industry professional group, on Monday.

Rather than banning plastic products to combat the problem of litter, it is more effective to raise people’s awareness of the careful use of resources of all kinds. “” When certain products are banned, the problem is shifted from plastic to other materials that are found on the beach. Litter should definitely be avoided, regardless of whether it’s made of plastic, aluminum, glass or paper, “” said Schwarzl.

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

Sign in Connect to Facebook Mailyn P.